Improving of State Regional Policy Mechanism at Risks` Conditions

Roman Tarasovich Lukysha


Аннотация


Modernization and innovatization were defined as the ways of improvement of the state policy of regional development from the safety perspective. They stipulate the following: 1) avoidance of the possible risks of the development of regions providing for the refusal of the unreliable programs and projects, unreasonable taking on credit and other kinds of loans; 2) risk sharing and convergence, as well as the reduction of their influence on the results of administrative activity; 3) determination and prevention of negative effect of risks. It was offered to carry out the improvement of the state policy of the development of regions with the help of the forming of stable organizational and informational network and system. It was specified that the difference between the latter is in the fact that the organizational and informational system concerns the financial side of administrative activity in regions. This means that it ensures the observance of the principle of transparency. While the organizational and informational network reflects its procedural side with the concept of openness being the basis of such activity. The improvement of the procedure of the organization of state administration of risks of the regional development was proved. It was established that organization of the state administration of the risks of regions development has a form of a chain: “provision of power and powers to the public authority → establishment of the new structural unit or addition of the existing administrative formations, approval of the functional regulations, official duties, etc. → competitive selection of the officials, their training, retraining, consulting → performance by them of the direct tasks on the detection and the prevention of the negative influence of dangers and threats.”

Ключевые слова


state policy; mechanism of forming and implementing; modernization and innovations; development of regions; risks; organizational and informational network and system

Полный текст:

PDF>PDF (English)

Литература


Bakumenko V.D.,Chervyakova O.V.Factor of self-organizational abilities in the theory and practice of public administration. Public administration and local self-government, no. 10 (2013):13–14.

Latunin N.A., Maystro S.V., Dunaev I.V. State regulation of innovation development of Ukraine’s economy: strategic priorities. Kharkov: Magister, 2014.

Degtyar A.O., Sobol R.G. Methodology compare of modernization and modification of public administration. Public Administration and Local Self-Government, no. 10 (2013):166–167.

Kovbasyuk Y.V., Surmin Y.P. Encyclopedia of public administration (in 8 volumes). Kiev, 2011.

Izha N.N. Direction of transformation of public administration in Ukraine in terms of social, economic and political modernization. Public administration and local self-government, no. 10 (2013):159–162.

Kryukova S., Shamanskaya A. Decentralization of public manager’s eyes. News. Reporter, no. 1 (2015):29–31.

Makarov G.V. Expected risks from decentralization of power in Ukraine. Analytical notes of the National institute for strategic studies, no. 12 (2012). http://www.niss.gov.ua/articles/1021/(accessed January 15, 2015).

Belaya S., Shevchenko A., Zhuk V. Ukraine’s regions after the crisis: risks and prospects for development. Kiev: NISS, 2011.

Shevchenko A., Zhuk V. Risks of economic development of Ukraine’s regions and overcoming these risks. Analytical notes of the National Institute for Strategic Studies, no. 11 (2012). http://www.niss.gov.ua/articles/478.(accessed January 15, 2015).

Parsons T. About structure of social action. Moscow: Academic Project, 2000.

Huntindton S. The Common Defense: Strategic Programs in National Politics. Columbia: Columbia University Press, 1966.

Wallerstein I. Modernization: requiescat in pace. The uses of controversy in sociology , no. 1 (1976): 283–316.

Latunin N.A., Maystro S.V., Dunaev I.V. State regulation of innovation development of Ukraine’s economy: strategic priorities. Kharkov: Magister, 2014.

Pomaza-Ponomarenko A.L. State administration in land-use relationships (central and regional levels). Young scientist,no. 2 (2015). http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/ru/archive/17/. (accessed January 15, 2015).

Buchwald E.M., Sazonov S.P., Mordvintsev A.I. Regional development institutions and the role of the regions in the innovation economy modernization. Business. Education. Law: Bulletin of the Volgograd Institute of Business, no. 1 (2013):186–197.

Meskon M. Bases of management. Moscow: Delo, 1995.

Mamaluy O.O. Bases of economic theory. Kiev, 2003.

Law of Ukraine “Principles of national security of Ukraine”from19.06.2003 № 964-IV. http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/964-15. (accessed January 15, 2015).

Dombrovskaya S., Gusarov A., Dudneva Y. Problems and prospects of development of public administration. Kharkov, 2014.http://nuczu.edu.ua/ukr/science/kriz/print/. (accessed January 15, 2015).

Official website of the Ministry of regional development, construction and housing and communal services of Ukraine. http://www.minregion.gov.ua/about/polozhennja-pro-ministerstvo/.(accessed January 15, 2015).

The Constitution of Ukraine. Kiev: Pressa Ukrainu, 1996.

Law of Ukraine “Budget Code of Ukraine”from08.07.2010 № 2456-VI.http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-17/page3 (accessed January 15, 2015). Dombrovskaya S., Gusarov A., Dudneva Y. Problems and prospects of development of public administration. Kharkov, 2014.http://nuczu.edu.ua/ukr/science/kriz/print/. (accessed January 15, 2015).


Ссылки

  • На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.


(c) 2016 International Journal of Advanced Studies



Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0.

ISSN 2328-1391 (print), ISSN 2227-930X (online)