COGNITIVE STYLES OF STUDENTS, STUDYING DOUBLE SPECIALTIES WITH DIFFERENT SUCCESS LEVEL

N. V. Zhbankova, N. V. Lukyanchenko


Аннотация


The article analyses the problem of psychological determination of the successful double specialty education in higher institution. The question of peculiarities of cognitive styles affecting mastering of subjects of a certain specialty and two specialties simultaneously is posed. On the basis of the analysis of the history of cognitive style studies two approaches to understanding their nature are distinguished: as constant and not interconnected peculiarities of cognitive activity and as adaptive cognitive strategies formed by an individual to solve different problems. We introduce some research data of cognitive styles of students with different degree of success in mastering a double specialty History and English Philology: successful in learning the foreign language, successful in learning History and weak and successful in subjects of both specialties. A set of methods identifying the following parameters of cognitive styles was used in the study: “fielddependency – fieldindependency”, “analyticity – syntheticity”, “impulsiveness – reflexivity”, “intellectual lability” and “leading representative systems”. It was brought to light that groups of respondents possess significant differences in every parameter of the cognitive styles. On the basis of analytical interpretation of the research data the conclusion is drawn that a cognitive style can be both specialized and quite flexible, adaptive, which depends on the range of modalities used for perception and digestion of information (what modalities are used, in what quantity and combination).

Ключевые слова


cognitive style; educational success; double specialty; fielddependency; fieldindependency; analyticity; syntheticity; impulsiveness; reflexivity; cognitive difficulty; leading representative system; cognitive flexibility

Литература


Alekseev A.A., Gromova L.A. Poimi menya pravil’no, ili kniga o tom, kak naiti svoi stil’ myshleniya, effectivno ispol’sovat’ intellectual’nye resursy i obresti vzaimoponimanie s lud’mi [Get me right or Book about how to find your own thinking style, effectively use intellectual resources and obtain a mutual understanding with people]. SPb.: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 1993.

Berulava G. A. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti integrativnogo kognitivnogo stilya “differentsirovannost’ – sintetichnost’” [Psychological peculiarities of integrative cognitive style “differentiation – syntheticity”]. Sovremennye problemy psikhologii myshleniya: ezhegodnik. No 1. M., 1994. pp. 54-64.

Bendler R. Ispol’zuite svoi mozg dlya izmeneniya [Use your brain to change]. M., 1996.

Grinder M., Loyd L. NLP v pedagogike [NLP in Pedagogics]. M.: Institut obcshegumanitarnykh issledovanii, 2001.

Klaus G. Vvedenie v obschedifferentsial’nuyu psikhologiu ucheniya [Introduction to general differential psychology of learning]. M.: Pedagogika, 1987.

Libin A.V. Stilevye i temperamentnye svoistva v structure individual’nosti [Style and temperament features of individuality]. M.: Progress, 1993.

Liver B.L. Obuchenie vsego klassa [Teaching whole class]. M.: Novaya schkola, 1995.

Liver B.L. Metodika individual’nogo obucheniya inostrannomu yazyku s uchetom vliyaniya kognitivnykh stilei na protsess ego usvoeniya [Methods of individual teaching of foreign language taking into consideration effect of cognitive styles on process of its mastering]. Dis. kand. ped. nauk [thesis]. M., 2000.

Merlin V.S., Klimov E.A. Formirovanie individual’nogo stilya deyatel’nosti v protsesse obucheniya [Forming of individual activity style in educational process]. Sovetskaya pedagogika. No 4. 1967.

Morsanova V.I. Individual’nyi stil’ samoreguluatsii proizvodstvennoi aktivnosti cheloveka [Individual style of self-regulation of industrial activity of a person]: avtoref. dis. d-ra psikhol. nauk [synopsis]. M., 1995.

Pecherskaya S.A. Vliyanie sootnosheniya kognitivnykh stilei uchitelya i uchaschikhsya na effectivnost’ uchebnogo protsessa [Impact of ratio of cognitive styles of teacher and students on effectiveness of studying]: dis. cand. psikhol. nauk [thesis]. Sochi, 1997.

Prakticheskaya psikhologia v testakh, ili Kak nauchit’sya ponimat’ sebyab drugikh [Practical Psychology in tests or Way to learn to understand yourself and others]. M.: AST-Press, 1999.

Psokhologicheskaya diagnostika [Psychological diagnostics] / pod red. [edited by] M.K. Akimovoi, K.M. Gurevicha. SPb.: Piter, 2003.

Psikhologicheskoe testirovanie [Psychological tests] / A. Anastazi, S. Urbina. SPb: Piter, 2007.

Kholodnaya M.A. Kognitivnye stili: o prirode individual’nogo uma [Cognitive styles: About nature of individual mind]. SPb.: Piter, 2004.

Kholodnaya M.A. Kognitivnyi stil’ kak kvadripolyarnoe izmerenie [Cognitive style as quad-polar dimension]. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal. No 4. 2000. pp. 46 – 56.

Witkin H.A., Oltman P.I. cognitive style. Internat. J. of Neurology.1967. Vol. 6. pp. 119 – 137.

Witkin H.A., Goodenough D.R., Oltman P. Psychological differentiation: current status. J. of Personality and Soc. Psychology. 1979. Vol. 37. pp. 1127-1145.

Witkin H.A., Goodenough D.R., Karp S.A. Stability of cognitive style from childhood to young adulthood. J. of Personality and Soc. Psychology. 1967. Vol. 7. pp. 291 – 300.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2070-7568-2014-5-11

Ссылки

  • На текущий момент ссылки отсутствуют.


(c) 2016 Наука Красноярья



Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0.

ISSN 2070-7568 (Print)